CND header

AIA Home > SBSE Home > Teaching Resources > Carbon Neutral Design > Carbon Neutral Teaching > Theis - Comprehensive Building Design Studio > Site Analysis - Senses

arrow Project Introduction

arrow What is Carbon Neutral Design?

arrow Carbon Neutral Design Process

arrow Carbon Neutral Design Strategies

arrow Carbon Calculation Protocols

arrow Carbon Calculation Tools

arrow Carbon Neutral Case Studies

arrow Carbon Neutral Teaching

Curriculum Projects Overview

Projects (by professor):

> Bagneid
> Boake
> Chalfoun
> Demers + Potvin
> Elzeyadi
> Guzowski
> Haglund
> Kaiser
> La Roche
> Peña
> Rashed-Ali
> Stannard
dot Theis
Comprehensive Building Studio
Site Analysis - Senses
Site Analysis - Topography & Vegetation
Site Analysis - Climate
Site Analysis - Site Visit
Design Strategy - Sustainable Elements
Schematic Design - Resource Consumption
Design Development - Envelope
Design Development - Details

> Thomson

Projects (by teaching topic):
visit this link to see the projects sorted by the carbon related topic

> Frameworks and Goals
> Site
> Building Form / Integrated Design Overview
> Envelope
> Passive Strategies
> Efficient Mechanical Strategies
> Energy
> Materials
> Water
> Miscellaneous Related Topics
> Integrated Topics

arrow Resources

arrow Links

 
The Carbon Neutral Design Project:
Carbon Neutral Teaching: Curriculum Materials Development
Chris Theis
School of Architecture, Louisiana State University

Comprehensive Architectural Design Studio
Senior Studio

Site Analysis - Senses

Design Performance Objective

Comprehensive Building Design Project:
William M Colmer Visitors Center and Park Headquarters

Site Analysis - Senses

Student: Amy Fruge
 

Fall 2007 Arch. 5001 (UG) Comprehensive Architectural Design Studio

Part 1 - Site Analysis - Senses

In the first phase of the project the students were instructed to produce a written program document with a problem statement and statement of intent, a written and graphic site analysis/interpretation, and an analysis ofappropriate precedents. These two images illustrate a few of these. The objective of these exercises was to develop an understanding of the relationship between the building program and the site that would serve to facilitate the realization of the designer’s intentions as the design process unfolded.

 

Investigative Strategy

Field measurements and observations, client and user interviews, “Google Earth”, sensory perceptions, etc.

 

Evaluation Process

Individual documents were evaluated based on the following: document form
(appearance, layout, spelling, grammar, readability); graphic representations;
understanding and analysis of basic site, precedent, and program information; interpretation of this information; statement of design intentions; and active participation on research teams and in on-site exercises.

 

Evaluative Criteria

Document form (appearance, layout, spelling, grammar, readability), graphic
representations, quality of observations.

 

Cautions - Possible Confusions
None
Range of Applicability in terms of CLIMATE
This type of project responded to the HOT HUMID climate zone in this instance, but it can easily be modified to suit any climate type.
Range of Applicability in terms of TYPE
This type of approach is suitable for any scale or type of building.
Reference Material
Hinchman, Hannah. A Trail Through Leaves: The Journal as a Path to Place. (esp. “The World as Events”)
Lynch, Kevin. Site Planning. (esp. Chapter 6 “The Sensed Landscape and It’s Materials”)
Norberg-Schulz, Christian. “The Phenomenon of Place.” From Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture, Kate Nesbitt, ed.
Potteiger, M. and Purinton, J. Landscape Narratives. (esp. “The Nature of Landscape Narratives”)
Sewall, Laura. Sight and Sensibility. (esp. Chapter 1 “Vaeieties of Visual Experience”)
Duration of Exercise
Approximately three weeks for the Site Analysis Phase.
Two days on site required as a group.
Additional site visits as required by individual studenys and small groups.
Degree of Difficulty / Previous Knowledge Required
Easy for some, challenging for others.
Depends on their perceptual skills.


   

 

©2012 American Institute of Architects | Society of Building Science Educators | Legal Disclaimer