CND header

AIA Home > SBSE Home > Teaching Resources > Carbon Neutral Design > Carbon Neutral Teaching > Theis - Comprehensive Building Design Studio > Site Analysis - Climate

arrow Project Introduction

arrow What is Carbon Neutral Design?

arrow Carbon Neutral Design Process

arrow Carbon Neutral Design Strategies

arrow Carbon Calculation Protocols

arrow Carbon Calculation Tools

arrow Carbon Neutral Case Studies

arrow Carbon Neutral Teaching

Curriculum Projects Overview

Projects (by professor):

> Bagneid
> Boake
> Chalfoun
> Demers + Potvin
> Elzeyadi
> Guzowski
> Haglund
> Kaiser
> La Roche
> Peña
> Rashed-Ali
> Stannard
dot Theis
Comprehensive Building Studio
Site Analysis - Senses
Site Analysis - Topography & Vegetation
Site Analysis - Climate
Site Analysis - Site Visit
Design Strategy - Sustainable Elements
Schematic Design - Resource Consumption
Design Development - Envelope
Design Development - Details

> Thomson

Projects (by teaching topic):
visit this link to see the projects sorted by the carbon related topic

> Frameworks and Goals
> Site
> Building Form / Integrated Design Overview
> Envelope
> Passive Strategies
> Efficient Mechanical Strategies
> Energy
> Materials
> Water
> Miscellaneous Related Topics
> Integrated Topics

arrow Resources

arrow Links

 
The Carbon Neutral Design Project:
Carbon Neutral Teaching: Curriculum Materials Development
Chris Theis
School of Architecture, Louisiana State University

Comprehensive Architectural Design Studio
Senior Studio

Site Analysis - Site Visit

Site Visit Notes
The image above is one of several that the student
recorded in a journal while on the site after generating
the previously illustrated data. The intent was to place
the quantitative data in the context of the qualitative
experience of the site and to generate specifi c design
strategies.

Design Performance Objective

Comprehensive Building Design Project:
William M Colmer Visitors Center and Park Headquarters

Site Analysis - Site Visit

Student: Amy Fruge
 

Fall 2007 Arch. 5001 (UG) Comprehensive Architectural Design Studio

Part 4 - Site Analysis - Site Visit

Illustrate the investigation of relationship between possible design strategies and the climate and microclimate, and the quantitative physical properties of the site.

 

Investigative Strategy

Climate Consultant, Sun, Wind and Light, The Green Studio Handbook, data provided by the National Park Service, etc.

 

Evaluation Process

Individual documents were evaluated based on the following: document form
(appearance, layout, spelling, grammar, readability); graphic representations;
understanding and analysis of basic site, precedent, and program information; interpretation of this information; statement of design intentions; active participation on research teams and in on-site exercises and accuracy and appropriate interpretation and illustration of design strategies.

 

Evaluative Criteria

This exercise can be somewhat subjective, but the most important thing is that the student takes it seriously. If the students are aware that they will be expected to use the results in the schematic design phase of the oroject they are likely to take it more seriously. Specifi c evaluation criteria are thoroughness (did they “cover all of the bases”), composition (is there a clear
sequence of ideas), and clarity (do the diagrams make sense).

 

Cautions - Possible Confusions
See evaluative criteria above.
Range of Applicability in terms of CLIMATE
This type of project responded to the HOT HUMID climate zone in this instance, but it can easily be modified to suit any climate type.
Range of Applicability in terms of TYPE
This type of approach is suitable for any scale or type of building.
Reference Material
Brown, G.Z. and Mark DeKay. Sun, Wind, and Light: Architectural Design Strategies.
Duration of Exercise
First three weeks of a semester-long project. Students were on the site as a group for two days and were able to return to the site as necessary as individuals or in small groups.
Degree of Difficulty / Previous Knowledge Required
Relatively easy. Depends on how seriously the students take it.


   

 

©2012 American Institute of Architects | Society of Building Science Educators | Legal Disclaimer